The more intense the mental anguish, the better chance you have of proving that your emotional distress was severe enough to deserve compensation. See Fletcher v. Western National Life Insurance Co., 10 Cal.App.3d 376 (1970). In this case, it must be proven that the offender's actions were committed to purposely cause emotional distress to the injured party. Still, as an overall definition, it consists of extreme or outrageous conduct, meant to cause intense emotional distress to another, which results in causing that distress. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, (often abbreviated to IIED), is defined by various countries, and in the U.S., even differing in some jurisdictions. For a general discussion, see N J Mullany and P R Handford Tort Liability for Psychiatric Damage (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1993) esp pp 43–58. For more detailed discussion, sec FA Trindade ‘The Intentional Infliction of Purely Mental Distress’ (1986) 6 OJLS 219. To prove this claim, the behavior of the actor must have been intentional or reckless, extreme and outrageous, be the cause of the emotional distress and the distress … Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is defined as intentionally or recklessly causing another person severe emotional distress through extreme or outrageous acts. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: This claim for emotional distress occurs when a defendant’s actions are intentional or reckless. "Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. For example, an employer having you fired and escorting you out in handcuffs may be humiliating, that treatment would likely not rise to a level of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The elements are: (1) The defendant acted intentionally or recklessly; Duration. Intentional infliction of emotional distress is another type of distress an injured party can sue for in court. Can I sue a person under current UK law for either negligence or intentional infliction of emotional distress under tort law, if I can prove all the 4 elements listed: The individual acted intentionally or recklessly; & Individual’s conduct was extreme & outrageous; & Individual’s act is the cause of the distress; & I suffer severe emotional distress due to defendant’s conduct. This can be a result of either the Defendant's acts or words. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Information about intentional infliction of emotional distress, a claim characterized by extreme or outrageous conduct that intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress. An intentional infliction of emotional distress claim may be difficult to prove because of the circumstances and availability of evidence. In this article, we'll discuss how an NEID claim works. In tort law, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) refers to when a defendant intentionally or recklessly behaves in a way that is so “extreme and outrageous” that it causes another person to suffer severe emotional distress or trauma. In some cases, however -- particularly, cases alleging negligent (rather than intentional) infliction of emotional distress, courts will typically require some sort of physical injury as well. Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), also known as intentional infliction of mental distress or the tort of “outrage,” is a tort claim for intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress.